|
Product Features
for Daily Thermal Profiling
PCB
Assemblers' Demands Drive Reflow Oven Profiling Technology:
Today's assemblers seek thermal profiling equipment that provides
cost-effective technology for daily use in production.
by Martin Ingall, Phil Manto and Nissim Sasson
A shorter version
of this article was published in the Electronic Packging &
Production (EP&P) magazine
The concept
of performing thermal profiles for reflow soldering is now widely
accepted throughout the printed circuit board assembly industry.
Thermal profiles are performed on a board-by-board basis during
prototyping or at the time of assembly start-up. The desired thermal
profile then should be safeguarded and its parameters maintained
when running boards.
The past 10
years have seen the homogenization of commerically available thermal
profiling technology. This has been simultaneous to improved understanding
among production and process engineers of their basic profiling
needs. Where are we now? There are two answers.
First, managers
and engineers at surface mount facilities already owning thermal
profilers are frustrated by their underutilization. Traditional
thermal profiling is time consuming and inconvenient. Additionally,
the complexity of data packages and reliance on software analysis
disqualifies these devices from real-time production application.
Managers are dissatisfied because they want continuous process control
and reporting. The paradox: process engineers know that daily profiling
is necessary and that production departments would like to perform
this task. Yet, both know that manufacturing engineers and technicians
often do not have the time or expertise to endure the tediousness
of a standard thermal profile. So process engineers continue to
do the best they can, by at least establishing an initial profile.
Second, many
plants which have not yet acquired a thermal profiler continue to
put off such a purchase due to good education and prudent spending.
Managers now know that practical, production-oriented thermal profiling
is what they need. They also recognize that spending money for a
thermal profiler that is not accessible or used regularly by machine
operators is of limited value.
Today's PCB
assembler demands for thermal profiling equipment can be summarized
in one phrase: cost-effective technology for daily use in production.
There are five basic demands in this area: ease of use, immediate
access to data, simplification of software, survivability and price.
Ease of Use
Once a direct thermal profile has been performed on a board, the
dilemma of monitoring oven performance and the board profile itself
becomes apparent. To solve this problem, manufacturing managers
now seek reference profiles for their board and independent oven
monitoring after initial, direct profiling. That calls for prefabricated
thermal sensor cards with high quality, permanently affixed top-side
and bottom-side thermocouples that can be used repeatedly and indefinitely.
(Fig.1) This relieves the need to affix thermocouples directly to
a board each time a profile is desired, thereby saving time and
product.
Another trouble
spot is the need to frequently recharge the power pack of conventional
thermal profilers. Design improvements and economics in energy consumption
now permit simple battery packs to power profilers for more than
1000 runs, without hassling with recharging stations or power packs
- yet another step towards ease of use.
Ease of use
also means the ability to run a thermal profiler repeatedly without
the immediate need to download data to a PC. The profiler's memory
should be able to store multiple runs, permitting the user to collect
an entire bank of data for analysis. That means less time on the
computer and more time directly attending to the production line.
 |
| Click
on image for a larger view! |
| Fig.
2 Reflow module inputs thermal profile data to its own
display at oven. |
Immediate
access to data
Manufacturing engineers and technicians now demand immediate access
to entire sets of run information when their profiler exits their
oven. The development and availability of at-oven LCD displays permit
the instant viewing of the important temperature and peak area information.
(Fig. 2)
Equally important
is the automated extraction of data from the temperature graph in
simple, practical form. When this is accessible to the oven technician
on his or her demand, it means instant response to oven performance
deviations and operator errors. This response happens before boards
are run each day, effectively transferring the identification of
defects form post-facto board inspection to pre-run process control.
This is critical for today's demands for high quality, fast turnaround
with process documentation run by run.
This is a dramatic
and most welcome development. It transfers the use of thermal profilers
from setup and troubleshooting to daily, preemptive process control.
In this sense, the much older field of thermal profiling is just
catching up to the newer process control procedures of wave soldering,
which were brought about by board-wave interaction measurement capabilities
introduced to wave soldering only several years ago.
 |
| Click
on image for a larger view! |
| Fig.
1 Simplified software shows thermal profiles from the utilization
of a thermal sensor card whereby three thermocouples are employed
successfully. |
Simplification
of Software
Manufacturing managers know that software must by simple to navigate
and read in order to tabulate and graph core information. They know
that quality happens in production every day, every shift, and that
real-time reporting based on daily information is the key to complete
defect reduction and process control. Likewise, while engineering,
process control, prototype and QA departments may have the mission
of extensive thermal profiling and detailed analysis, they know
that without regular (daily) monitoring of the process, their prescriptions
have limited value.
There is also
a demand for software designed for use by machine operators and
engineers alike on a daily basis. While managers and engineers no
longer want to be the sole, exclusive proprietors of all software
use, competition has driven profiler vendors to develop an ever-expanding
labyrinth of software features. Now, look for newer software to
offer simplicity and still meet all of the feature requirements
for most users. The key here is utility, not sophistication.
Survivability
Thermal profilers
operate in harsh environments. Consequently, their life span often
ends after about two years of regular use. If this is true, the
thermal profiler has become a consumable and defies the definition
of even a small capital equipment purchase.
 |
| Click
on image for a larger view! |
| Fig.
3 Superior thermal barriers for reflow profilers reduce
internal temperature for achieving indefinite survivability. |
Unlike conventional
asbestos sleeves, steel boxes and internal heat sinks, advances
in materials science now permit superior thermal barriers for profilers.
(Fig. 3) These yield internal profiler temperatures some 30°C
lower than what was previously attainable. Such materials are the
direct result of civilian application of military technologies.
Indefinite survivability of thermal profilers is now possible, vastly
enhancing the cost-effectiveness of their purchase.
Price
Last, but not least, is price. Assembly plants are confounded that
years of intense competition among profiler vendors has not resulted
in demonstrable downward price pressure. Instead, profiler costs
have crept up year to year, particularly with the addition of numerous
bells and whistles. Low-cost thermal profilers - in the $2000 range
- which respond to the new user requirements, are now stepping into
this void. Their affect on the marketplace and, more importantly,
on process control procedures for surface mount assembly, has finally
taken hold.
|